<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>




PubMed4Surgeons                



</description><title>PubSurg</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @pubsurg)</generator><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/</link><item><title>Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations : The Lancet</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61083-7/fulltext"&gt;Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations : The Lancet&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;This themed issue of LANCET is featuring Surgery. A long way from “&lt;a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8606606"&gt;comic opera&lt;/a&gt;”.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/196701171</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/196701171</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:23:36 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>PLoS ONE: Early In-Hospital Mortality following Trainee Doctors' First Day at Work</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007103"&gt;PLoS ONE: Early In-Hospital Mortality following Trainee Doctors' First Day at Work&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;No difference in surgery.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/196608390</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/196608390</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:38:26 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Current Management of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19351284?ordinalpos=1&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum"&gt;Current Management of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;A nice review.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/195220640</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/195220640</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:26:49 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>NEJM -- The Writing on the Wall</title><description>&lt;a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/361/11/e19?rss=1&amp;query=current"&gt;NEJM -- The Writing on the Wall&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;No exactly surgery, but NEJM does it again. Medicine 2.0 at its best!&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/184419369</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/184419369</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:16:50 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Morning colonoscopy may catch more polyps | Health | Reuters</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE57B42J20090812?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=healthNews"&gt;Morning colonoscopy may catch more polyps | Health | Reuters&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Polyps were found in 29 percent of patients who had a colonoscopy in the morning, versus 25 percent of those who were screened in the afternoon. There was also evidence that detection rates dipped as the day wore on, according to findings published the American Journal of Gastroenterology.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/162143653</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/162143653</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:56:13 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>JAMA -- Abstract: Aspirin Use and Survival After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer, August 12, 2009, Chan et al. 302 (6): 649</title><description>&lt;a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/302/6/649?rss=1"&gt;JAMA -- Abstract: Aspirin Use and Survival After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer, August 12, 2009, Chan et al. 302 (6): 649&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusion &lt;/b&gt; Regular aspirin use after the diagnosis of&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;colorectal cancer is associated with lower risk of colorectal&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;cancer–specific and overall mortality, especially among&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;individuals with tumors that overexpress COX-2.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/161123000</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/161123000</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:11:31 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122543343/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;British Journal of Surgery&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/161065074</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/161065074</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:23:54 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Lidocaine Reduces Pain and Anxiety From Peripheral IV Cannula Insertion</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.mdlinx.com/painlinx/news-article.cfm/2830003"&gt;Lidocaine Reduces Pain and Anxiety From Peripheral IV Cannula Insertion&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Its cool, but…..WHO does that???&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/160461292</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/160461292</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:18:42 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Chest radiography of life-supporting medical interventions</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673609603123/fulltext?rss=yes"&gt;Chest radiography of life-supporting medical interventions&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/158539350</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/158539350</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:45:16 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Journal of GI Surgery - Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias with Restoration of Abdominal Wall Function</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/t88434x357386830/"&gt;Journal of GI Surgery - Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias with Restoration of Abdominal Wall Function&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Dr. Rosens amazing new method!&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/158080979</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/158080979</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:32:52 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>NEJM -- Apixaban or Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Replacement</title><description>&lt;a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/361/6/594"&gt;NEJM -- Apixaban or Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Replacement&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions&lt;/i&gt; As compared with enoxaparin for efficacy of thromboprophylaxis&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;after knee replacement, apixaban did not meet the prespecified&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;statistical criteria for noninferiority, but its use was associated&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding and it had&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;a similar adverse-event profile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/157286579</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/157286579</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:43:26 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>I will restart the blog</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Due to new interest in &lt;a href="http://scienceroll.com/2009/08/03/surgery-2-0-call-for-submissions/"&gt;surgery 2.0&lt;/a&gt; I will restart the postings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/155816235</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/155816235</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:20:56 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>JAMA: Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer </title><description>&lt;p&gt;Regge, D., Laudi, C., Galatola, G., Della Monica, P., Bonelli, L., Angelelli, G., Asnaghi, R., Barbaro, B., Bartolozzi, C., Bielen, D., Boni, L., Borghi, C., Bruzzi, P., Cassinis, M. C., Galia, M., Gallo, T. M., Grasso, A., Hassan, C., Laghi, A., Martina, M. C., Neri, E., Senore, C., Simonetti, G., Venturini, S., Gandini, G. on 6/16/09 Context Computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been recognized as an alternative for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk individuals, but less information is available on its performance in individuals at increased risk of CRC. Objective To assess the accuracy of CT colonography in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of CRC using unblinded colonoscopy as the reference standard. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Individuals at increased risk of CRC due to either family history of advanced neoplasia in first-degree relatives, personal history of colorectal adenomas, or positive results from fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) were recruited in 11 Italian centers and 1 Belgian center between December 2004 and May 2007. Each participant underwent CT colonography followed by colonoscopy on the same day. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in detecting individuals with advanced neoplasia (ie, advanced adenoma or CRC) 6 mm or larger. Results Of 1103 participants, 937 were included in the final analysis: 373 cases in the family-history group, 343 in the group with personal history of adenomas, and 221 in the FOBT-positive group. Overall, CT colonography identified 151 of 177 participants with advanced neoplasia 6 mm or larger (sensitivity, 85.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 79.0%-90.0%) and correctly classified results as negative for 667 of 760 participants without such lesions (specificity, 87.8%; 95% CI, 85.2%-90.0%). The positive and negative predictive values were 61.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-68.0%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 94.6%-97.5%), respectively; after group stratification, a significantly lower negative predictive value was found for the FOBT-positive group (84.9%; 95% CI, 76.2%-91.3%; P &lt; .001). Conclusions In a group of persons at increased risk for CRC, CT colonography compared with colonoscopy resulted in a negative predictive value of 96.3% overall. When limited to FOBT-positive persons, the negative predictive value was 84.9%. Things you can do from here: - Subscribe to JAMA current issue using Google Reader - Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/126973111</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/126973111</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Head and neck injury risks in heavy metal: head bangers stuck between rock and a hard bass</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/337/dec17_2/a2825"&gt;Head and neck injury risks in heavy metal: head bangers stuck between rock and a hard bass&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Due to having no Internet at home, this is my first post since couple of months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But a good one, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/66451423</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/66451423</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:00:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Clostridium difficile -- More Difficult Than Ever.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://A nice review.____(NEJM 2008)"&gt;Clostridium difficile -- More Difficult Than Ever.&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/57266210</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/57266210</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:15:52 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Poor Agreement Among Expert Witnesses in Bile Duct Injury Malpractice Litigation: An Expert Panel Survey.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.annalsofsurgery.com/pt/re/annos/abstract.00000658-200811000-00017.htm;jsessionid=JCCXnyqS5wGW7G4CbLR4KScwXF48DQQGp38388rxpX6yvfJJp7n1!-985563194!181195629!8091!-1"&gt;Poor Agreement Among Expert Witnesses in Bile Duct Injury Malpractice Litigation: An Expert Panel Survey.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;Thirteen independent experts reviewed 10 closed litigation cases. In 1 of the 10 cases, full agreement was observed. In 7 of the 10 cases, the highest percentage of agreeing experts was 53% or less. Chance-corrected levels of agreement were in the slight to fair range (Kendall W coefficient of concordance = 0.16-0.25). Disease-related mortality was associated with judgments on negligence (P = 0.02). Judgments on negligence of care were not associated with delay in diagnosis or the severity of injury. Experts with more years of clinical experience agreed more about negligence. Experts working in an academic setting agreed less than experts working in a teaching hospital. Finally, 8 of the 13 experts plead for the assignment of more than 1 expert witness to review and comment in a surgical litigation case.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Ann Surg 2008]&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56249113</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56249113</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:56:46 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Prognostic Factors for Gallbladder Cancer in Japan.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.annalsofsurgery.com/pt/re/annos/abstract.00000658-200811000-00016.htm;jsessionid=JCCTS77H3bQlQlJD1W6mmQHtHf1YWx73M7G06p23MrsqQZ5n9TTs!-985563194!181195629!8091!-1"&gt;Prognostic Factors for Gallbladder Cancer in Japan.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Survival is related closely to the surgical stage. Five-year survival rates for stage I, II, III, IVA, and IVB (5th edition) were 83%, 70%, 45%, 23%, and 9%, respectively. These differences were significant (P &lt; 0.0001). The survival rate for patients aged &lt;60 years was significantly better (P &lt; 0.05). The survival rate for patients aged &gt;69 years was significantly worse (P &lt; 0.01). The cholecystectomy plus combined resection of bile duct and/or liver bed resection had an effect on prolonging the survival in stage II or III disease, but extended resection did not. The patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction had a survival advantage over those with cholelithiasis by univariate analysis. However, multivariate analyses indicated that only age, sex, stage, operative procedures were independent prognostic factors. Stage was the strongest covariate; patients diagnosed with stage II, III, IVA, or IVB disease were 2.2, 4.2, 8.1, and 13.6 times, respectively, were more likely to die.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Ann Surg 2008]&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248975</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248975</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Impact of Prophylactic Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.annalsofsurgery.com/pt/re/annos/abstract.00000658-200811000-00010.htm;jsessionid=JCCFNZssScYNYPZZfpQmn5jlBqjxVRvVBpTrVrgwvXVPDl9YT7LK!-985563194!181195629!8091!-1"&gt;The Impact of Prophylactic Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Prophylactic dexamethasone decreases the incidence of nausea and vomiting after LC relative to placebo and may decrease the severity of postoperative pain. Dexamethasone does not increase the incidence of headaches or dizziness.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Ann Surg 2008]&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248758</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248758</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:52:54 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Operating Room Ventilation With Laminar Airflow Shows No Protective Effect on the Surgical Site Infection Rate in Orthopedic and Abdominal Surgery.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.annalsofsurgery.com/pt/re/annos/abstract.00000658-200811000-00001.htm;jsessionid=JCBBZ0P1WGKVs21jprMSnDtBBzwGQg7VzcfKnvPhFxGsPVHyhzyL!-1891305337!181195628!8091!-1"&gt;Operating Room Ventilation With Laminar Airflow Shows No Protective Effect on the Surgical Site Infection Rate in Orthopedic and Abdominal Surgery.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Unexpectedly, in this analysis, which controlled for many patient and hospital-based confounders, OR ventilation with laminar airflow showed no benefit and was even associated with a significantly higher risk for severe SSI after hip prosthesis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Ann Surg 2008]&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248573</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/56248573</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:50:53 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>K-ras Mutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer</title><description>&lt;a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/359/17/1757?rss=1&amp;query=current"&gt;K-ras Mutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;: Patients with a colorectal tumor bearing mutated&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;i&gt;K-ras&lt;/i&gt; did not benefit from cetuximab, whereas patients with&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;a tumor bearing wild-type &lt;i&gt;K-ras&lt;/i&gt; did benefit from cetuximab (overall survival median, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;9.5 vs. 4.8 months&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;The mutation status of the &lt;i&gt;K-ras&lt;/i&gt; gene had no influence on survival&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;among patients treated with best supportive care alone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[NEJM 2008]&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/55925523</link><guid>http://pubsurg.tumblr.com/post/55925523</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:32:37 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
